<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buiter again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/01/21/buiter-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/01/21/buiter-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Honohan</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/01/21/buiter-again/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Honohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=374#comment-382</guid>
		<description>Buiter's piece worth noting in particular for the pointed manner in which he spells out that nationalization should not mean open-ended guarantees for existing wholesale funders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buiter&#8217;s piece worth noting in particular for the pointed manner in which he spells out that nationalization should not mean open-ended guarantees for existing wholesale funders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McQuade</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/01/21/buiter-again/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McQuade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=374#comment-373</guid>
		<description>How significant is it that the Irish government guarantee of bank liabilities is only for a limited period?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How significant is it that the Irish government guarantee of bank liabilities is only for a limited period?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

