<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics for beginners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MLeFournier</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>MLeFournier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=913#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>B. Keenan says the Swedes and Danes offer a strategic insight: "if one has to impose hardship, spread it thick and make sure no citizen escapes entirely. That way, they are all furious and get in each other's way."

The Government has clearly allowed many citizens, including some of the least deserving, to escape unscathed.  It could and should remedy that fairly quickly.  But it will not be able to "spread it thick".

The problem is that the Government has planned to spread most of the pain over the next four years.  According to the "Addendum" document sent to the Commission (which, absurdly, is the current fiscal plan), the Government aims to save €2Bn. this year.  

In ordinary times, this would be a bold move but the collapse of revenues means that, in order to get the deficit down to Stability Pact levels, and then to make additional adjustments amounting to €4Bn in each of the following two years with further adjustments of €3.5Bn. and €3Bn. in 2012 and 2013 respectively.  That's €14.5Bn. in total savings and/or tax increases in the next four years.

The EU Commission is clearly sceptical about the Government's ability to deliver on these adjustments.  The measures announced in last October's Budget and subsequently will probably not deliver a full €2Bn. this year yet they have had such a severe impact on the Government that it is difficult to imagine how our political system can even attempt to deliver savings of  €14.5Bn. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B. Keenan says the Swedes and Danes offer a strategic insight: &#8220;if one has to impose hardship, spread it thick and make sure no citizen escapes entirely. That way, they are all furious and get in each other&#8217;s way.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Government has clearly allowed many citizens, including some of the least deserving, to escape unscathed.  It could and should remedy that fairly quickly.  But it will not be able to &#8220;spread it thick&#8221;.</p>
<p>The problem is that the Government has planned to spread most of the pain over the next four years.  According to the &#8220;Addendum&#8221; document sent to the Commission (which, absurdly, is the current fiscal plan), the Government aims to save €2Bn. this year.  </p>
<p>In ordinary times, this would be a bold move but the collapse of revenues means that, in order to get the deficit down to Stability Pact levels, and then to make additional adjustments amounting to €4Bn in each of the following two years with further adjustments of €3.5Bn. and €3Bn. in 2012 and 2013 respectively.  That&#8217;s €14.5Bn. in total savings and/or tax increases in the next four years.</p>
<p>The EU Commission is clearly sceptical about the Government&#8217;s ability to deliver on these adjustments.  The measures announced in last October&#8217;s Budget and subsequently will probably not deliver a full €2Bn. this year yet they have had such a severe impact on the Government that it is difficult to imagine how our political system can even attempt to deliver savings of  €14.5Bn. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clancy</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Clancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=913#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Any views on Obamas budget? ....he's just finishing his plans to bring back  overseas jobs in 6 months..Ireland Inc in ruin on Sept 11th...Mark my words..check out  U.S. websites etc .I have and it aint pretty.Irish media missed  this  BIG story last week... why ?Charlie Bird was in Cuba I think!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any views on Obamas budget? &#8230;.he&#8217;s just finishing his plans to bring back  overseas jobs in 6 months..Ireland Inc in ruin on Sept 11th&#8230;Mark my words..check out  U.S. websites etc .I have and it aint pretty.Irish media missed  this  BIG story last week&#8230; why ?Charlie Bird was in Cuba I think!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=913#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>Note that Keenan seems to favour the publication of "a detailed [fiscal] strategy for at least the next three years" rather than a "front-loaded" approach. Following the Swedish approach, the credibility of such a plan would require that Cowen and/or Lenihan promise to resign if clearly defined fiscal benchmarks are not achieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that Keenan seems to favour the publication of &#8220;a detailed [fiscal] strategy for at least the next three years&#8221; rather than a &#8220;front-loaded&#8221; approach. Following the Swedish approach, the credibility of such a plan would require that Cowen and/or Lenihan promise to resign if clearly defined fiscal benchmarks are not achieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2009/03/02/politics-for-beginners/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=913#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>The piece of course fails to deal with the crucial point - the Government has no mandate to introduce any of these policies. Fianna Fáil stood for election on a manifesto, written by B Cowan esq., which was a figament of his imagination then, as it is so clearly ludicrous now.

I am not sure how much good an election would do, but the difference is that an incoming Government would have a mandate to act. 

It does of course ring very hollow to be lectured by any journalist still working for Independent Newspapers,  a company hoplessly insolvent for reasons other than trading problems. I wonder how safe your pension is Brendan? I certainly would not trust mine to the O'Reilly family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The piece of course fails to deal with the crucial point - the Government has no mandate to introduce any of these policies. Fianna Fáil stood for election on a manifesto, written by B Cowan esq., which was a figament of his imagination then, as it is so clearly ludicrous now.</p>
<p>I am not sure how much good an election would do, but the difference is that an incoming Government would have a mandate to act. </p>
<p>It does of course ring very hollow to be lectured by any journalist still working for Independent Newspapers,  a company hoplessly insolvent for reasons other than trading problems. I wonder how safe your pension is Brendan? I certainly would not trust mine to the O&#8217;Reilly family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

