<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New IIIS research papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lefournier</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/#comment-37163</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefournier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5712#comment-37163</guid>
		<description>A fascinating report which puts the current debate on the Euro into perspective.  

If Europe hadn't offered us a ready-made alternative, would be still be tied to Sterling?  Even though Sterling had long lost its global status and was very volatile in the 1970s, it seems we only seriously considered breaking the link when France/Germany offered to revitalise the "snake".  Even then, we were hoping UK would join in which case we would presumably have retained parity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating report which puts the current debate on the Euro into perspective.  </p>
<p>If Europe hadn&#8217;t offered us a ready-made alternative, would be still be tied to Sterling?  Even though Sterling had long lost its global status and was very volatile in the 1970s, it seems we only seriously considered breaking the link when France/Germany offered to revitalise the &#8220;snake&#8221;.  Even then, we were hoping UK would join in which case we would presumably have retained parity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/#comment-36849</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5712#comment-36849</guid>
		<description>@Pat Donnelly

"While financial issues were to the fore in the discussions, the final decision to join was based on a strategic vision that Ireland’s economic and political future lay with Europe rather than with the former colonial power." (Honohan &#38; Murphy)

The 'strategic vision' was enlightened and sound. Credit where credit is due. Builds on the Whittaker/Lemass decision to open up economy/society - and Lemass certainly saw potential of Europe. I leave comments on implementation of the vision to TKW ......... and simply note that we could with a bit of Lemass' honesty, principled ruthlessness, integrity, and leadership these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pat Donnelly</p>
<p>&#8220;While financial issues were to the fore in the discussions, the final decision to join was based on a strategic vision that Ireland’s economic and political future lay with Europe rather than with the former colonial power.&#8221; (Honohan &amp; Murphy)</p>
<p>The &#8217;strategic vision&#8217; was enlightened and sound. Credit where credit is due. Builds on the Whittaker/Lemass decision to open up economy/society - and Lemass certainly saw potential of Europe. I leave comments on implementation of the vision to TKW &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; and simply note that we could with a bit of Lemass&#8217; honesty, principled ruthlessness, integrity, and leadership these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/#comment-36848</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5712#comment-36848</guid>
		<description>This is an un update of a interesting paper by Honohan on the history of the punt. It is a very worthwhle contriution as it examines he history of economic independence, and lack thereof, even in decisions to create a 'central bank', which was in reality nothing of the kind.

The main difference in assessment I would have is that the changes until the early 1990s were more gradualist in nature than Honohan describes, with much the 'snake' experience charcterised by more than one eye on Sterling and its gyrations, with frequent alarms for the punt itself. The rupture, and qualitiative change only took place in the ealry 1990s.

The question of whose interests these policies served, why? rather than what? is still underexamined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an un update of a interesting paper by Honohan on the history of the punt. It is a very worthwhle contriution as it examines he history of economic independence, and lack thereof, even in decisions to create a &#8216;central bank&#8217;, which was in reality nothing of the kind.</p>
<p>The main difference in assessment I would have is that the changes until the early 1990s were more gradualist in nature than Honohan describes, with much the &#8217;snake&#8217; experience charcterised by more than one eye on Sterling and its gyrations, with frequent alarms for the punt itself. The rupture, and qualitiative change only took place in the ealry 1990s.</p>
<p>The question of whose interests these policies served, why? rather than what? is still underexamined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/#comment-36846</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5712#comment-36846</guid>
		<description>@Pat Donnelly

"While financial issues were to the fore in the discussions, the final decision to join was based on a strategic vision that Ireland’s economic and political future lay with Europe rather than with the former colonial power." (Honohan &#38; Murphy)

The 'strategic vision' was enlightened and sound. Credit where credit is due. Builds on the Whittaker/Lemass decision to open up economy/society - and Lemass certainly saw potential of Europe. I leave comments on implementation of the vision to TKW ......... and simply note that we could with a bit of Lemass's honesty, principled ruthlessness, integrity, and leadership these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pat Donnelly</p>
<p>&#8220;While financial issues were to the fore in the discussions, the final decision to join was based on a strategic vision that Ireland’s economic and political future lay with Europe rather than with the former colonial power.&#8221; (Honohan &amp; Murphy)</p>
<p>The &#8217;strategic vision&#8217; was enlightened and sound. Credit where credit is due. Builds on the Whittaker/Lemass decision to open up economy/society - and Lemass certainly saw potential of Europe. I leave comments on implementation of the vision to TKW &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; and simply note that we could with a bit of Lemass&#8217;s honesty, principled ruthlessness, integrity, and leadership these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/new-iiis-research-papers/#comment-36717</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5712#comment-36717</guid>
		<description>History then, is contained in these papers. Are we the victors then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History then, is contained in these papers. Are we the victors then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
