<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Fiscal Policy:  More Letters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/uk-fiscal-policy-more-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/uk-fiscal-policy-more-letters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: We need to talk about Britain &#124; Ronan Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/uk-fiscal-policy-more-letters/#comment-37031</link>
		<dc:creator>We need to talk about Britain &#124; Ronan Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5706#comment-37031</guid>
		<description>[...] the two-armed science that is economics, one can find UK economists that have been out in force in favour of current UK fiscal policy and against.) Bookmark  Tags: euro, european economy, government [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the two-armed science that is economics, one can find UK economists that have been out in force in favour of current UK fiscal policy and against.) Bookmark  Tags: euro, european economy, government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/uk-fiscal-policy-more-letters/#comment-36739</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5706#comment-36739</guid>
		<description>Gavyn Davies, who has some form in this area, provides an interesting overview in today's UK Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/19/economists-letters-fiscal-cuts-policy

It prompts two observations.  First, this battle is being engaged via letters to the editors of broadsheets - the utlimate confirmation of impotence - and parliament has no means of assessing and forming a settled position on these divergent opinions that have such a major bearing on future fiscal and economic policy and, then, of imposing its will on government.

Secondly, as in the dog that didn't bark and as further proof of the impotence of parliament in Ireland - and in the context of, possibly, deeper crises, there is considerably less decision-informing debate in Ireland.

The debate on this site, such as it, seems to be - and probably never could be more than - an academic parlour game that the great unwashed are privileged to observe  - and on which they are gracefully permitted to comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavyn Davies, who has some form in this area, provides an interesting overview in today&#8217;s UK Guardian:<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/19/economists-letters-fiscal-cuts-policy" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/19/economists-letters-fiscal-cuts-policy</a></p>
<p>It prompts two observations.  First, this battle is being engaged via letters to the editors of broadsheets - the utlimate confirmation of impotence - and parliament has no means of assessing and forming a settled position on these divergent opinions that have such a major bearing on future fiscal and economic policy and, then, of imposing its will on government.</p>
<p>Secondly, as in the dog that didn&#8217;t bark and as further proof of the impotence of parliament in Ireland - and in the context of, possibly, deeper crises, there is considerably less decision-informing debate in Ireland.</p>
<p>The debate on this site, such as it, seems to be - and probably never could be more than - an academic parlour game that the great unwashed are privileged to observe  - and on which they are gracefully permitted to comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/2010/02/19/uk-fiscal-policy-more-letters/#comment-36572</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irisheconomy.ie/?p=5706#comment-36572</guid>
		<description>The conclusion of the FT editorial was interesting, in my view.

"Friday’s letters are an embarrassment for the Tories, above all, who sought to capitalise on the first letter. They must learn – soon – that their desire for simple political messages is no excuse for nuance-free policy positions".

Also in the editorial, the point was made that gilt yields immeditely rose when monthly tax returns undershot consensus estimates. Perhaps the general lesson is that bond investors are looking closely at tax returns, and give a thumbs up to those economies where tax revenues are reviving, and a thumbs down where they continue to decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conclusion of the FT editorial was interesting, in my view.</p>
<p>&#8220;Friday’s letters are an embarrassment for the Tories, above all, who sought to capitalise on the first letter. They must learn – soon – that their desire for simple political messages is no excuse for nuance-free policy positions&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also in the editorial, the point was made that gilt yields immeditely rose when monthly tax returns undershot consensus estimates. Perhaps the general lesson is that bond investors are looking closely at tax returns, and give a thumbs up to those economies where tax revenues are reviving, and a thumbs down where they continue to decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
