You terminated in decidely non-Amsterdam style “the discussion” elsewhere. Thuggish soccer players like van Bommel get transferred to Munchen, with full Dutch approval. So grandma, have you seen my fiets?

Before you terminated the discussion, a uniquely curious web-behaviour, you pitched a technical glitch as the reason for the omission for a rigourous comment (tech analysis possibly suggests otherwise). Just a few weeks after the possible but unlikely glitch from another universe you went to town on another human’s website claiming that human was censoring your esteemed comments. That’s not in the spirit of Amsterdam nor in the black stocking towns out in the bogs on the wrong side of the Amstel Veense bogs where Irish criminals hide out.

Holland may be flat. However you have directly stated in flat-earth style that incineration has been ruled out as the cause for one thousand excess deaths in Amsterdam (compared to Rotterdam, Utrecht, Etc).

You have repeatedly given totally evasive references, similar to you evasive references to Gorecki on PM 2.5s. I recognise economics is only a dismal science. True scientists give full, direct and non-evasive references, and usually include apt excerpts.

The following is your totally cynical and evasive reference now “closed to discussion”, a decidely non-Dutch behaviour:

EX: “On the matter of excess deaths in Amsterdam, I have repeatedly referred you to the RIVM website: http://www.rivm.nl/ ”

This evasive and non-specific reference is totally dishonest. Some but not others consider it to be a lie. Its less honest
than a reference to http://www.aol.com/nowhere/sodemieterop .

Remember you are a public servant paid by Irish taxpayers; your total-cost-envelope of €200,000 per year can perhaps better fund hospitals now shuttered by lousy pyramid scheme non-advice from ESRI.

So claiming you have better things to do as you have done than to educate the aardapple eaters of ireland is not credible.

Especially with ESRI bending over backwards on this site to support esri-spin-funder ‘undue-influence-in-public-process-DCC’, and indirectly lawbreaker Covanta.

Please supply a direct reference to your assertion that incineration has been ruled out as the cause for one thousand excess deaths in Amsterdam.

Mit tiefer Dankbarkeit!

Lomborg has also time and again rallied against the ignorance of many a green. You neatly illustrate his point.

I think, by the way, that one should be reluctant to mock a parent of a chronically and seriously ill child.

100 bn expenditure, eh, Mr. Tol. I guess you can cross Bjorn off your Christmas card list. Do I detect a space opening up in the book market for an academic entrepreneur?

Perhaps another thread dealing with Lomberg’s alleged ‘recantation’ - accompanied perhaps by some consideration of the scientific assessment of the IPCC’s procedures might be a way of keeping the focus.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/aug/30/bjorn-lomborg-climate-change-u-turn