Frank Daly on Residential House Prices

The complications caused by the absence of a properly representative national house price index have been illustrated again via a speech given by NAMA’s Chairman Frank Daly (see NAMAWinelake here). Frank discusses NAMA’s assessment of the residential sector as follows:

On the residential sector the Central Bank is forecasting falls of 60% from peak (end 2006) to end 2012 under its adverse scenario or 55% under its baseline scenario – based we understand on the PTSB\ESRI index. At NAMA we are not surprised by this and it is not as alarming as one would first think. We do not believe that the PTSB\ESRI index currently showing close to 40% fall from peak is realistic and reflective of where the market is. NAMA’s base valuation date was November 2009 and at this date we were already taking account of on average 50% falls in residential property values from the peak.

So while the residential market may have some little more to fall and no one can be certain that an average fall of 60% from peak may not occur in residential house prices, we would believe that the bulk of this has happened already.

Based on my own anecdotal sample, I’m inclined to agree with Daly that residential prices have fallen more than shown by the PTSB\ESRI index. However, the implications for the Central Bank stress testing exercise strike me as a little more serious than Daly suggests. Daly indicates that most of the peak-to-trough decline envisaged in the Central Bank stress scenarios has already happened.

But this raises the question as to whether the stress scenarios should be based on a peak-to-trough calculations or should they be based on an assumption about a current level of prices and an additional assumption about further declines. It’s not clear why the scenarios should be based on a peak-to-trough assumption. And if, for example, the valuation of residential mortgage portfolios is based on an inaccurate assessment of current levels of house prices, then this may undermine the credibility of the calculations. I would hope that the report accompanying the stress test results would discuss this issue.

Michael Casey in DRB

Some readers might be interested in Michael Casey’s ‘Must do Better’, just published in the online Dublin Review of Books at http://www.drb.ie/more_details/11-03-17/Must_Do_Better.aspx

The DRB is generally brilliant and worth supporting.

Paschal Donohoe: Why the 31st Dáil Should Not be the Default Dáil

Drawing on the international literature on the costs of default, newly elected Fine Gael TD Paschal Donohoe has written an interesting pamphlet on the option of a unilateral default (see here).   Whether you agree with his conclusion or not, it is great to see people of Paschal’s calibre in the new Dáil.

The pamphlet is referenced in Daniel McConnell’s article today in the Sunday Independent (see here).    Daniel comes out strongly for a default-now position.    He draws heavily on the Prime Time programme on default in supporting this position.   One of those quoted is Philip Lane.   Not too surprisingly, the short snippets that could be used in the report do not do justice to Philip’s nuanced position.   If you haven’t had the opportunity to view Philip’s interview, I think it is well worthwhile to view in full.   While recognising the seriousness of the situation, I think he gets the balance just about right (full interview here).  

Stress Tests

The next milestone in Ireland’s crisis resolution efforts will be the March 31st stress tests. In addition to revealing important information to financial markets, the results of the tests are likely to impact the political debate about the appropriate crisis resolution strategy, not least the contentious issue of default. At the moment, there appears to be a lot of confusion about what the stress tests are all about, which is important to clear up in advance to prevent the release being counterproductive in terms of the political debate. I offer some thoughts after the break, but I hope others will weigh in on the thread.

Central Bank PCAR Stress Scenarios

The Central Bank has published the macroeconomic scenarios for its 2011 Prudential Capital Assessment Review (PCAR).