The Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy

On the budget documents is The Economic and Fiscal Outlook. This goes beyond the details of the 2012 Budget and provides guidance on the government’s medium-term plans and projections out to 2015.

Some of the noteworthy details in this publication include

  • pages D16-D17 show how the government intends to meet its revenue targets without raising income tax rates or touching income tax bands or personal credits (and also no more increase in the top VAT rate).  What is required is a big increase in local charges (property tax etc) and other measures to broaden the tax base (cutting back on various income tax reliefs, reduction in tax related costs of private pension provision, broadening of PRSI base).
  • Table 11 on page D19 shows the evolution of various expenditure and revenue categories over 2010-2015
  1. total revenue very flat as a ratio to GDP (34.6 percent of GDP in 2010 and 2015)
  2. government consumption down from 17.0 percent of GDP in 2010 to 13.7 percent of GDP in 2015
  3. public investment (row 21) down from 3.7 percent of GDP in 2010 to 1.4 percent of GDP in 2015
  4. social transfers (row 18) down from 18 percent of GDP in 2010 to 13.6 percent of GDP in 2015
  5. interest payments up from 3.1 percent of GDP in 2010 to 5.7 percent of GDP in 2015
  • Table 14 on page D23 shows the decomposition between cyclical and structural components. Here, the government is using the official EU estimate of Ireland’s level of potential output and, as in previous publications, is quite critical of this measure, especially since it implies that Ireland will be operating above potential in 2014 and 2015.  It would be desirable for the government to also report its own preferred measure of potential output, since the split between structural and cyclical imbalances is so critical in interpreting the fiscal position. Going further, it would be desirable for the government to indicate the role of ‘special factors’ in determining the underlying structural fiscal balance. Just as the property boom, relatively high inflation and the large current account deficit led to a revenue windfall during the boom,  the usual relation between the fiscal balance and GDP is distorted during this adjustment phase due to deleveraging, the under-shooting of construction adjustment, real exchange rate depreciation and external rebalancing.
  • Page D15 outlines risks to the outlook.  Under the Troika MoU, the fiscal targets are minimum thresholds. It would be interesting to know the contingency plans in the event that an undershooting of GDP requires further spending cuts or tax increases. (That said, it is possible that the existing spending and revenue targets have implicit built-in contingency allowances on a prudential basis.)

FT Analysis: Warily On the Way Back

David Gardner writes an extensive article on the Irish situation in the FT Analysis slot today.

SAMA

The WSJ reports that the new Spanish government may soon set up an asset management agency (SAMA?) to buy out the distressed property loans of its banking system.

Question for the readership: is this advisable?

Budget 2012

The budget documents are here.

NY Times on Irish Austerity

Paul Krugman links to this New York Times piece on Ireland’s recent experience with austerity, which reminds me to link to something Seamus Coffey wrote recently on exactly how much austerity we’ve endured. Seamus goes beneath the headline 21 billion and looks at where cuts have actually (or probably actually, this isn’t an exact science) happened. He finds the figure should be closer to 10 12 billion euros.

Krugman’s point is more basic than Seamus’, because most of the people reading this blog in Ireland probably know the difference between GDP and GNP in our context. Here’s the monthly economic bulletin (.pdf) from the Department of Finance. We can see the difference in GDP and GNP right away from the table I reproduce below which shows percentage changes by quarter. We can also see the effects on the elements of GDP and GNP here.