The latest EU Commission Review of Ireland can be read here.
The Third Review by the IMF can be read here.
A previous post looked at the overall government accounts using Table 21 from the CSO’s National Income and Expenditure Accounts. Here we use the figures from Table 24: Transfer Payments to focus on the largest expenditure item. As we saw in the previous post expenditure on current transfer payments rose from €21.3 billion in 2006 to €28.9 billion in 2010.
Table 24 provides a breakdown of current transfer payments in 43 different categories. Here we combine many of them together to form ten main groups. For example, Pensions includes contributory, non-contributory, retirement and invalidity pensions, Unemployment includes unemployment assistance, unemployment benefit and redundancy payments. Other transfers such as Child Benefit and the Supplementary Welfare Allowance are used as standalone groups.
The two largest named categories in the Other Transfer Payments group are the local authority housing rental deficit (€660 million in 2010) and the social employment scheme (€361 million). Apart from miscellaneous categories all other elements of this group are smaller.
If required Table 24 provides the figures for all 43 categories but the ten categories used here provide sufficient detail for this glance into our transfer payments where the purpose is to inform rather than advocate. Some details and 2010 figures of the classifications used by the Department of Social Welfare are available here.
Anyway this is the table produced using the ten groups.
About 40% of the increase since 2006 is as a result of the increase in direct unemployment payments. The increased level of unemployment will also have led to the increase in other payments. Pensions form the largest category and account for about one-fifth of the increase. Child Benefit payments were actually lower in 2010 than they were in 2006.
UPDATE: An extended table with details going back to 1997 can be seen by clicking here.
The monthly Exchequer Account publications tend to get more attention than they deserve because of the frequency of their release. Although the Exchequer Account is useful, it is a somewhat distorted view of the overall fiscal situation. On the revenue side it excludes PRSI and Motor Tax, among others, while the expenditure side is based around the largely meaningless concept of “net expenditure”.
The Exchequer Account gives the misleading impression that the government “spends €50 billion and brings in €30 billion”. We can get a truer, but less timely, insight into the fiscal situation from the CSO’s National Income and Expenditure Accounts which were published a few weeks ago for 2010.
Here we focus on Table 21: Receipts and Expenditure of Central and Local Government. Tables 22 to 29 provide further details of the aggregate figures provided here.
First, here is government expenditure since 2006. Item 246: Redemption of Securities and Loan Repayments is excluded from the extract reproduced below.
Grants to Enterprises includes €4,000 million to Anglo Irish Bank in 2009 and €31,575 million of Promissory Notes issued to Anglo, INBS and EBS in 2010. These are the only items directly related to the banking bailout in the table. If these are excluded total expenditure was €71,737 million in 2009 and €69,947 million in 2010.
Government expenditure in 2010, excluding the banks, was 44.8% of GDP and 54.6% of GNP.
Second, here is government revenue. Item 236: Borrowings is excluded in this instance.
Government revenue in 2010 was 32.8% of GDP and 39.9% of GNP
Since running close to a balanced budget in 2007, expenditure has increased from €68 billion to €70 billion while revenue has fallen from €67 billion to €51 billion.
In 2010, there was an overall deficit of €18.8 billion. This is expected to fall to around €15 billion this year. It has been revealed that a “three-year plan” will be published in the autumn giving outline details of how this will be brought down to €5 billion by 2015.
On the expenditure side the largest items are transfer payments and public sector pay. The capital budget has already been cut by one-half. The deteriorations on the taxation side are well known as these are not clouded by the archaic accounting practices used to generate the Exchequer Account.
The “low-lying fruit” has been picked and the time for the “heavy lifting” is approaching.
Here is a quick look at the overall Leaving Cert performance of students taking Economics in the Leaving Cert. Just over 8% of Leaving Cert students took Economics as a subject.
This year around 3,700 took the Higher Level Paper and it can be seen that the distribution of marks was consistent with the previous two years. There were 1,063 candidates for the Ordinary Level Paper.
A breakdown of the marks for all 34 Leaving Cert subjects can be seen here.
There were no candidates for Ancient Greek and Hebrew Studies. Of the papers that were taken the lowest number of candidates was the 32 who sat the Higher Level Agricultural Economics paper. The most attempted paper was the Ordinary Level Maths paper with 37,505 candidates.
The number of students that took the Higher Level Maths Paper did indeed set a record low as was previously discussed here.