Archive for the ‘Lisbon Treaty’ Category

Commission proposals for the next EU budget Multi-annual Financial Framework to be published this week

By

Monday, June 27th, 2011

On Wednesday (June 29th) the Commission is scheduled to reveal its proposals for the next Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) which will set out the scale and composition as well as the proposed financing of the EU budget over the period to 2020. However, some reports suggest that Commission President Barroso is putting aside two days for the Commission College to agree the proposal so it may be later in the week before it sees the light of day. This is an important issue for Ireland, and this post discusses the issues to watch for in the Commission’s proposal.

(more…)

The Economic, Legal and Social benefits of the Lisbon Treaty

By

Monday, September 28th, 2009

Q & A UCD Tuesday 29th 1pm, Theatre Q, UCD Arts Block

The Economic, Legal and Social benefits of the Lisbon Treaty

 Speakers:

Dr. Gavin Barrett, Expertise in EU Constitutional Law.

Prof. Patrick Paul Walsh, Expertise in International Development Studies.

Prof. Brian Nolan, Expertise in Public Policy.

Hosted by Generation YES and UCD Students’ Union

Ireland’s Power in Europe: Guest Post by Macartan Humphreys on the Lisbon Treaty

By

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

We are pleased to carry this very insightful article by Macartan Humphreys of Columbia University (and a graduate of TCD!): you can download this article here.

The economics of the Lisbon vote

By

Monday, September 21st, 2009

In this post, I want to raise the economic consequences of the vote on the Lisbon Treaty on October 2nd, not the economic consequences of the Lisbon Treaty itself. The post is prompted by my amazement at hearing the comments of Professor Ray Kinsella of the Smurfit Business School when debating the economic consequences of a No vote with Pramit Ghose of Bloxham on Morning Ireland this morning.

Ghose argued that the financial markets will exact a price if there is No vote on October 2nd. Noting that 80% of Ireland’s debt is owned by international investors, he argued that a No vote would raise uncertainty for these investors who would consequently seek an extra premium for lending to Ireland. Going back to the experience in January–February earlier this year when Anglo-Irish bank was nationalised, he suggested that this premium could be an extra 1% on the borrowing rate the Irish government would have to pay.

This view of an adverse financial fallout from a No vote was disputed by Ray Kinsella, essentially on the basis of efficient market theory. His argument essentially is that the markets are already pricing in the possibility of Ireland saying No, so that if we actually say No, there will be no effect on the premium paid over German Bunds. As evidence for this, he noted that the yield premium over Bunds has been narrowing in recent months, again underlining the complacency with which the markets are viewing a No vote.

Now, Ray Kinsella went on to say that he did not think that the Treaty was good for either Ireland or Europe, so presumably he will be a No voter himself. But, from where I sit, there is a big difference between factoring in the probability of a No vote and the actual reality of a No vote. If markets are reading the opinion polls, they might assess the probability at, say, 40%. If voters do reject the Treaty, the probability ex post is 100%. This is surely not an insignificant difference.

More generally, I was interested to learn that there are economists prominent in public debate who are advocating a No vote on 2nd October. This seems to fly in the face of the Indecon survey which reported that Ireland’s economists are strongly in favour of a Yes vote, though their survey was confined to academic and research institute economists and specifically excluded economists working in the media and banks or other financial institutions. Their findings indicate that 91% of the economists surveyed believed that, taking all factors into account, Ireland’s overall economic interests would be best served by a ‘Yes’ vote.

As I was on holiday at the time, I did not respond to the Indecon survey, but I am a strong supporter of a Yes vote on October 2nd. Perhaps, given the understandable attention to NAMA in these posts over recent weeks, we have not given enough attention to debating the issues at stake in the Lisbon Treaty referendum. Although I want to confine this thread to what readers think is riding on the outcome of the referendum for the economy, if demand is there a thread could be opened on the economic implications of the Treaty provisions themselves. While financial markets are one channel whereby the referendum vote will affect the economy, there are clearly other channels as well, including foreign investment inflows as was highlighted at the benefit bash in Farmleigh over the weekend.

Certainly, Ray Kinsella’s comments were a wake-up call for me that Yes supporters can leave nothing to chance for referendum day.

The Social and Economic benefits of Lisbon

By

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

I have written a piece for the Ireland for Europe Blog.

http://blog.irelandforeurope.ie/

Explaining the Lisbon Referendum Vote

By

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Last week saw the release of a major study (by a group of political scientists and economists, including this blog’s Kevin O’Rourke) of the factors that explain voting decisions in the Lisbon Treaty Referendum: you can read it here.  No doubt these factors will be closely studied in deciding strategies for the upcoming 2009 vote on the ‘modified’ Lisbon referendum.