A reminder that the deadline for submitting your paper to the 35th Annual Irish Economic Association Conference is the end of this week.
The deadline for submissions is Friday 11th of February 2022 and submissions can be made through this site.
The 35th Annual Irish Economic Association Conference will be hosted by the University of Limerick in the Castletroy Park Hotel on Thursday 5th May and Friday 6th May 2022.
Please note that the conference will be held in person and will not be a hybrid or online conference.
How
exposed is Ireland to foreign shocks? Relying on residence-based measures of
foreign holdings to answer this question can be challenging. These statistics
are obscured by the vast presence of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) in the
country. In residence-based statistics, foreign assets and liabilities are
sorted according to the residence of the immediate counterparts. Consequently,
the cross-border positions held by these Irish-resident financial
intermediaries appear in Ireland’s external balance sheet. However, these
entities frequently have no economic ties to Irish agents. Lane
(2019) notes that the large size of these holdings
imply that the positions of Irish agents are not visible in the headline data.
Such opaqueness poses an obstacle for policymakers when assessing the exposure
of the Irish economy to foreign shocks.
Consider
a foreign-owned SPE resident in Ireland whose sole purpose is to raise capital
from international investors and transfer these resources to the company’s
headquarters located abroad. Suppose this Irish-resident company sells one
billion Euros in bonds and lends one billion Euros to its parent company. Under
the residence-based approach, the bonds issued by this entity and purchased by
international investors will be recorded as Irish foreign liabilities.
Similarly, the loans sent to its home country will be booked as Irish foreign
assets. As a result, the presence of this SPE in Ireland will increase the sum
of Irish external assets and liabilities by two billion Euros. However, the
activities conducted by this company have virtually no relation to Irish
agents. In line with this example, Galstyan
et al. (2021) provide evidence of
cross-country financing happening through Irish-resident SPEs.
Alternatively,
one could rely on consolidated-by-nationality statistics to provide a more
accurate description of Irish foreign exposure. Its key principle is to sort
foreign assets and liabilities according to the nationality of the ultimate
counterparts. In this example, such approach would imply leaving the holdings
of the SPE out of Ireland’s consolidated foreign balance sheet as these
holdings do not have Irish agents as their ultimate counterparts. By not
incorporating such holdings, the consolidated-by-nationality balance sheet
would provide a more accurate description of the foreign exposure related to
Irish agents.
In Sanchez
Pacheco (2021), I construct the Irish
consolidated-by-nationality foreign balance sheet for the period between 2011
and 2019. The balance sheet is constructed using a novel methodology that
builds on firm-level data.
Figure 1
shows the size of Ireland’s balance sheet measured by the sum of its foreign
assets and liabilities using both methodologies. The key stylized fact that
emerges from this analysis is that Ireland’s consolidated-by-nationality
foreign balance sheet is on average 46.7% smaller when compared to its
residence-based analogue. Devereux
and Yu (2020) show that international
financial integration increases the degree of cross-country contagion.
Therefore, I interpret this finding as indicating that Ireland is less exposed
to foreign shocks than what is captured by residence-based statistics.
Figure 1: Sum of Ireland’s foreign assets and liabilities
Note: This figure shows the evolution of the sum of Irish
foreign assets and liabilities. The blue line shows such sum when calculated
using the consolidated-by-nationality approach in Sanchez Pacheco (2021). The
black line comes from Lane and Milesi-Ferretti’s External Wealth of Nations
database and shows the sum when calculated using a residence-based approach.
The role of multinationals
Ireland’s
consolidated foreign balance sheet expanded over the past ten years. What were
the key drivers behind such expansion? Figure 2 shows the evolution of Irish
consolidated foreign liabilities according to different categories. It shows
that affiliates of foreign non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs) were
the key contributors to such expansion.
In
general, foreign non-bank MNEs represent the main source of Irish international
financial integration. In 2019, their activities are associated with EUR 923.2
billion in Irish foreign assets and EUR 2,172.1 billion in foreign liabilities.
Note: This figure shows the evolution of Irish
consolidated-by-nationality foreign liabilities related to each category.
Foreign companies that have changed their domicile to Ireland are excluded from
the sample.
The outsized presence of U.S. MNEs in Ireland
Of that
amount, U.S. MNEs are the most relevant ones as their activities account for
over half of the Irish foreign liabilities related to foreign non-banks. Figure
3 shows Ireland’s consolidated foreign holdings related to the activities of
foreign non-banks MNEs according to the nationality of their ultimate owners. U.S.
firms are followed by German and U.K. firms in distant second and third places.
This
result suggests that Ireland is particularly exposed to shocks in the U.S. that
affect the global decision-making of these MNEs.
Figure 3: Ireland’s consolidated foreign assets and
liabilities related to foreign non-banks MNEs
Note: This figure shows Irish consolidated foreign assets and
liabilities related to foreign non-banks operating in Ireland for 2019. Foreign
holdings are sorted according to the ultimate counterpart countries that own
these companies operating in Ireland. These holdings are estimated using data
from Bureau van Dijk’s FAME data-set.
Conclusion
Residence-based
measures of Irish foreign holdings are obscured by the vast presence of
financial intermediaries in the country. Alternatively, I construct an estimate
of the Irish consolidated-by-nationality foreign balance sheet for the period
between 2011 and 2019. I find that Ireland’s consolidated-by-nationality
foreign balance sheet is on average 46.7% smaller than its residence-based
analogue over the sample period. This result indicates that Ireland is
significantly less exposed to foreign shocks than what is typically suggested
by residence-based statistics.
This
paper is part of the Consolidated Foreign
Wealth of Nations project that seeks to create publicly available estimates
of consolidated-by-nationality foreign assets and liabilities for multiple
countries. This dataset will complement the seminal External Wealth of Nations work by Lane and Milesi-Ferretti which
provides estimates of residence-based external holdings for all countries.
Contact email: sanchean@tcd.ie. The author would like to thank
the Irish Research Council for the financial support provided.
The annual conference of the Economic and Social History Society of Ireland will take place online, hosted by NUI Galway, on the Friday and Saturday this week.
It includes
the K.H. Connell Memorial Lecture, which will be given by Prof. David Dickson
(TCD), on ‘Ireland and the Caribbean in the 18th century’.
There are
panels on: family and identity; the urban environment and public health;
transnational relationships; urban labour and politics; deeds, debts and
discovery in the 18th century; food and society in the nineteenth
century; social policy and the law in the 20th century;
prisons and society; economic policy and independence; the economics of
hospitals; changing dynamics in pre-independence Ireland; and popular
culture in 20th-century Ireland.
Registration is free. The full programme of papers as well as a link for registration is available at:
The 35th Annual Irish Economic Association Conference will be organised by the University of Limerick and held in the Castletroy Park Hotel on Thursday, May 5th and Friday, May 6th, 2022.
The Association invites submissions of papers to be considered for the conference programme. Preference will be given to submissions that include a full paper. Papers may be on any area in Economics, Finance and Econometrics.
The deadline for submissions is Friday 11th of February 2022 and papers can be submitted for consideration here iea2022.exordo.com.
OECD Unit for New Approaches to Economic Challenges (NAEC)
GOVERNMENT ECONOMISTS FOR NEW ECONOMIC SYSTEMS (GENESYS)
Thursday 4 November, 3:00 pm – 5:00 pm (CET)
Abstract
New analytical and systems-oriented approaches and integrated policy approaches are required to understand and manage inter-connected systemic issues.
In a Systemic Recovery from Covid-19, as governments are forced to apply cross-disciplinary and integrative economics to the formulation and implementation of policy, it will become increasingly necessary to build new analytical capabilities and narratives within governments.
In moving from analysis and diagnoses of systemic challenges to policy alternatives, the New Approaches to Economic Challenges (NAEC) Unit at the OECD has establishedGovernment Economists for New Economic Systems (GENESYS) as a platform for debating, experimenting and discussing policy alternatives and the analytical approaches which underpin them.
Opened by the President of the Eurogroup, Irish Finance Minister, Paschal Donohoe
Followed by a roundtable discussion on lessons from the Covid crisis for new economic thinking and acting, chaired by Financial Times Associate Editor Rana Foroohar with panellists:
Jonathan D. Ostry, Deputy Director of the Research Department, International Monetary Fund and Research Fellow at the Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) “Challenges for Policies” Jo Swinson, Director, Partners for a New Economy (P4NE) William White, Senior Fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto, and former chairman of the OECD Economic and Development Review Committee Sweta C. Saxena, Chief, Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development, UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) Eric Beinhocker, Executive Director of the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) Oxford, and Professor, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford Megan Greene, Economist, Senior Fellow, Harvard Kennedy School Angus Armstrong, Director, Rebuilding Macroeconomics Thomas Fricke, Director, New Economy Forum and Chief Economist, European Climate Foundation Michael Jacobs, Professorial Fellow, Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI) Alan Kirman, Chief Advisor to the NAEC Initiative
If you wish to join the GENESYS network, please send your name, email address and affiliation to naec@oecd.org